| Item: | Dimensions: | Weight: |
|---|---|---|
| Luxury Damask Design Table Runner | 70 - 90" W x 13" D | 1.5 lbs |
| Care: | Machine Washable |
| Color Options: | Beige, Gold, Red |
| Material: | Polyester |
| Other: | Additional Colors |
| Pattern Options: | Floral, Texture / Embroidery |
| Product Category: | Dining Linens |
| Type: | Table Runner |
|
Shirley from Saint Cloud, MN
|
2/17/2013
Luxury Damask Design It is very nice. I wish it would have been in a different color. It is really not violet which I was looking for. So I am disappointed with that color. Thank you. |
|
oneslice from VALLEY STREAM, NY
|
11/29/2012
Linen runner It does the job. it is pretty. I got it in gold. My dining room table is black lacquer. it looks good. |
|
Ranae from AZ
|
11/5/2012
another great find! I picked up this item for a dark stained dresser in my bedroom. This adds the soft elegant touch I was hoping for. I can't believe I paid less than $20 for this...it is higher quality than I expected...looks much better in person than the webpage shows. |
|
DD from Chicago, IL
|
7/15/2012
Thin material but still great I placed this on my cherry wood dining room table. Adds a touch of class. Thin material doesn't lay flat all the way across the table, but nonetheless, still looks great! Would buy again |
|
Regina from Salisbury Mills, NY
|
3/5/2012
Looks beautiful! I am using this runner on my cream colored dresser - looks gorgeous! Many people only use runners on their tables - try it on your dresser - so pretty! |
|
Crystal from Orlando, FL
|
12/30/2011
Nice for the price! I think this is a very nice table runner for the price. I would say that the quality is in the middle, not great but not terrible either. The color is as described and does have a rich look. The fabric itself isnt as nice as some of the more expensive table runners that I have seen. I would buy this product again. |
|
Anonymous from Florida
|
3/24/2013
|
|
Anonymous from Texas
|
9/23/2012
|
|
Anonymous from California
|
9/18/2012
|
|
Anonymous from Massachusetts
|
1/22/2012
|